Шаблоны LeoTheme для Joomla.
GavickPro Joomla шаблоны

banner rehabilitation

Review Article

Ergospirometry and Respiratory Pathology

Galindo Canales, M, Francisco Javier Calderon Montero*

Department of Health and Human Performance, School of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences (INEF), Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

*Corresponding author:  Dr. Francisco Javier Calderon Montero, Department of Health and Human Performance, School of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences (INEF), Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Martin Fierro 7, 28040 Madrid (Spain), Email: franciscojavier.calderon@upm.es

Submitted: 02-03-2016 Accepted: 03 -08-2016 Published: 04-11-2016

Download PDF





Ergospirometry is a diagnostic procedure that provides insight into the body’s response to dynamic stress in such a way that it is used routinely in stress-test laboratories, mainly due to technological developments that have made it easier to nalyze the data recorded [1]. The importance of this diagnostic test is reflected in the number of references found in PubMed by merely searching the words “gas exchange and exercise”: 383 results, and 115 results when the phrase “Pulmonary diseases” is added. Likewise, numerous publications exist that address ergospirometry from other perspectives [2-5]. Finally, it should be noted that many major companies dedicated to the development of ergospirometry incorporate flow design diagrams to their software [5]. However, despite the ease with which modern devices provide information, understanding the meaning of respiratory parameters requires adequate training in respiratory function that is not always easy to achieve.

The respiratory [6] and vascular tracts [7,8] are considerably complex, in such a way that it’s difficult to explain in a simplified manner how respiratory exchange occurs during exercise. For this reason, it’s helpful to utilize a rather elementary model of the respiratory system: the mono-alveolar model.

The aim of this work is to present in a didactic manner the application of ergospirometry in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases that may be susceptible to this diagnostic evaluation, utilizing the mono-alveolar model for explanation purposes (Figure 1). Given the intended objective, it is presumed that the reader is familiar with the theoretical fundamentals of gas exchange analysis. However, the reader may consult any of the publications previously mentioned above [2-5] and articles on the theory of gas exchange [9-12]

.rehab fig 24.1


Figure 1. Mono-alveolar model of the respiratory system. The lung is considered as a single alveolus, attached to the outside by a tube; both parts are set within a box whose pressure can be changed; the tube is a rigid element, whereas the alveolus is an elastic component.

2. The Main Ergospirometric Parameters Used in the Assessment Of Various Respiratory Diseases

Due to the incorporation of technological advances in the method of pulmonary gas exchange analysis, the number of parameters available in any commercial device can exceed 70, depending on whether they are indirect, derived or introduced by the professional in charge of the procedure. Nevertheless, despite a large amount of data, the reality is that any modern device only measures 4 parameters (change in O2, change in CO2, heart rate, and ventilation), while the remaining parameters are obtained from simple arithmetic operations of these four basic variables [13]. Therefore, in order to orient the reader to the practical acquisition of the information provided by modern ergospirometric devices, only the main parameters will be explained.

On the other hand, respiratory diseases susceptible to ergospirometric assessment can be divided into obstructive (Figure 2) and restrictive (Figure 3), essentially on the basis of a given pattern identified by a conventional spirometry test. As such, all pathologies that limit the ability to “introduce” or “eliminate” the air from the respiratory tract (obstructive diseases) present a characteristic pattern distinctive and different from those diseases that “limit”,” restrict” or “shorten” the capacity of the thoracic cavity or the lung parenchyma itself (both alveolar and interstitial) which lead todecrease of the effective lung compliance

.rehab fig 24.2

Figure 2. Obstructive condition.

rehab fig 24.3

Figure 3. Restrictive condition

It is not the aim of this work to describe the abnormal patterns of spirometry (table 1) and their etiology (table 2 and 3), even though they are shown. The interested reader may consult the texts of internal medicine or specific articles, 

rehab table 24.1

Table 1. Abnormal spirometric patterns. TPC: total pulmonary capacity. RV: residual volume; VC: Vital capacity; FEV1,0: forced expiratory volume in the first second of the forced expiratory maneuver; FVC: forced vital capacity; MIP: maximal inspiratory pressure; MEP: maximal expiratory pressure; N: normal.

In section 2.2, the ergospirometric parameters discussed are those that provide the most information in order to differentiate obstructive pathologies from restrictive ones, without distinguishing within the latter whether they are due to parenchymal alterations (parenchymal restrictions) or due to alterations in the rib cage and its components (extraparenchymal restrictions). In addition, parameters that indirectly provide information on the ventilation/perfusion ratio are also analyzed. 

rehab table 24.2

Table 2. Causes of obstructive spirometric patterns. 

rehab table 24.3

Table 3. Causes of restrictive spirometric patterns.


However, it is obvious that if there is an alteration in resting state, this will be further shown during exercise. When exercise is performed, an increase in alveolar ventilation (VA) occurs, as shown schematically in Figure 4. If a respiratory disease is present, either obstructive or restrictive type, there is already a limitation at rest (decreased CV), and this will inevitably worsen during exercise

2.1 General parameters of Ergospirometric Assessment

Maximum Oxygen Consumption (VO2max). This parameter significantly summarizes the body’s response to exercise by providing data related to the cardiovascular system, the respiratory system, and the metabolism. The two equations that express VO2 are important in order to understand the physiological significance of this parameter.

VO2=Q x Dif a - v O2 (Equation 1)

VO2=V(FIO- FEO2)(Equation 2)

In an elementary fashion, equation 1 indicates that the VO2 depends on the “pumping” action of the heart (cardiac output or Q value) and oxygen transport capacity (blood and blood circulation) as well as the capacity of tissues in general, and musculature specific to extracting oxygen from the arteries (arteriovenous oxygen difference A-a DifVO2 value). Equation 2 indicates that the VO2 depends on the air moved by the breathing apparatus (ventilation V value) and the ability to extract oxygen from inhaled air. The way of expressing the second equation is only valid when inhaled volume (VI) is equal to exhaled volume (VE). Otherwise, it would be necessary to use the Haldane transformation (Haldane and Graham 1935), [14], but as pointed out by Poole, David C in the letter to the editor section, this idea was proposed by Geppert and Zuntz [15].

Anaerobic Threshold (AT). The term ‘anaerobic threshold’ was coined by Wasserman and McIlroy [16] when using the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) to detect the beginning of anaerobic metabolism in patients with heart problems performing stress tests. Later, Wasserman et al. [17] defined AT as 1) a non-linear increase in ventilation (VE), 2) a non-linear increase in the elimination of CO2 (VCO2), 3) an increase in the partial pressure of O2 during a series of breaths (Peto2) with no corresponding drop in the partial pressure of CO2(PetCO2), and 4) an increase in RER with workload (all during an incremental exercise test).

Nevertheless, despite the definition provided by Wasserman et al., the complexity of this parameter lies both in its conception [18] and varying terminology [19]. For this reason, many authors prefer the term aerobic-anaerobic transition. Here we will use VT1 for the first increase in ventilation in response to intensity and VT2 for the second increase in ventilation in response to intensity

2.2. Differential Diagnosis Guiding Parameters of the different  pathologies susceptible to Ergospirometric Assessment.

As indicated above, modern devices provide a great number of parameters, making analysis complex. Table 4 shows all parameters used in the ergospirometric assessment that may be useful in the diagnosis for a number of respiratory pathologies, as described by Wasserman et al [5].

Upon analysis of the table, the following can be concluded:

1st) All variables are indirect measures of respiratory functions (ventilation, diffusion and ventilation / perfusion and gas transport). Specifically, variables 4, 5, 6 and 7 are estimates of ventilation/perfusion ratio on an overall level – not specific.

2nd) Some of the relationships are based on estimates. For example, the MVV variable typically isn’t measured but is instead estimated from regression equations [5]. In our laboratory, MVV is measured systematically (but among a healthy
population), unlike other hospital ergospirometry laboratories.

3rd) Some of the variables require an invasive procedure for measurement. For example, variables 5 and 6 require vessel puncture, either arterial or venous. Nevertheless, technological advances have made non-invasive assessment possible, as with pulse oximetry, in order to determine tissue oxygenation. This procedure measures the arterial oxygen saturation, but not PaO2. Therefore, this technique has proven to be an important non-invasive assessment tool, but not without presenting errors at rest, and even more during exercise. 

Pulse oximetry usefulness in different lung disease related situations has been demonstrated:

- Monitoring the improvement of pulmonary patterns after physical exercise programs in chronic pulmonary patients. Given the changes that occur in blood oxygenation during physical exercise, pulse oximetry helps assess the severity of the disease and the effect of training in pulmonary patients. The onset of increased oxygen desaturation of a 4% during regulated exercise suggests a significant desaturation, pointing to chronic lung disease, and it is used to assess the need and prescribe the use of oxygen.

- Seeking advice in patients at risk for lung resection: using pulse oximetry with standardized exercise has been demonstrated to show greater predictive power than spirometry, regarding the post-resection pulmonary outcome. 

rehab table 24.4

Table 4. Parameters used in ergospirometric assessment.

However, as previously pointed out, pulse oximetry has certain limitations, especially noticeable when applied to sports, where movement artifacts appear when undergoing a test in motion [20].

Lately, important progress is being made in the technology used in pulse oximetry, achieving reliable reading results in stress tests, minimizing the movement artifacts, even in maximal exercise.

In addition to these approximate parameters of assessment of gas exchange during exercise, other parameters should also be noted, including those that provide information regarding the load (watts or treadmill speed), cardiovascular system
function (EKG, blood pressure), the blood transportability (hemoglobin concentration, etc.) and acid-base state (pH, bicarbonate concentration, lactate concentration, etc.). These additional variables yield further complexity in understanding the body’s response to incremental exercise.

Since the objective of this work is to provide a basic overview of the practical information provided by ergospirometry in the assessment of lung disease (obstructive and restrictive types), we outline the most useful applications. This does not call for any experienced reader to think that all the important variables are described.

VD/ VT. Normally, the VD is about 1/3 of VT and during exercise it is reduced to 1/5 or more, reaching the lowest VD/ VT ratio when VA/ Q ratio is even. Under conditions of a poor ventilation/ perfusion ratio, when the respiratory system is “ineffective”, the result is an increase in VD (poorly ventilated and/or perfused alveoli) even at rest. Upon increasing the intensity, although VT increases, the number of nonfunctional alveoli also increases, resulting in a possible alteration of VA/ Q ratio.

In Figure 4 the ratio VD/ VT is represented during incremental exercise in a healthy person and in a patient with the obstructive respiratory disease. In the model of Figure 5, having an obstruction, it is consistent that the ratio VD/ VT is stable for two reasons: 1) these patients have limited capacity to raise their VT progressively and 2) they increment their VE in the expense of their respiratory rate (RR).

rehab fig 24.4 

Figure 4. VD/VT ratio during incremental exercise in a healthy person
and in a patient with obstructive respiratory disease.

P (A-a) O2. If there is a respiratory disease that determines that some alveoli do not receive sufficient oxygen, the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PpAO2) may maintain if the other alveoli offset malfunction. However, the partial pressure of oxygen (PpO2) will decrease, and, therefore, the alveolar-arterial (A-a) gradient will increase. This problem is accentuated during exercise, as illustrated in Figure 5. This parameter has the disadvantage of being invasive, as the partial pressure of oxygen must be measured in arterial blood. 

rehab fig 24.5 

Figure 5

P (a-ET)CO2. The end-tidal pressure of oxygen (ETP of CO2) is a parameter that Wasserman proposed to give an idea lung’s ability to remove CO2. The response of this variable may suggest an altered VA / Q ratio, or an increase in alveolar dead space. For example, if the patient suffers from a disease that keeps some alveoli from removing carbon dioxide, ETP of CO2 will remain below normal values. During exercise, as CO2 removal demand is increased, ETP of CO2 will keep stable as it was at rest, instead of decreasing as it happens in healthy people. Generally, Pa CO2 at rest is about 2 mm Hg greater than the ETP of CO2however, during exercise, ETP of CO2 increases in relation to PaCO2, with a negative difference between both (about - 4 mm Hg). Figure 6 shows the response of this variable in a healthy person (side a) and in a patient with an obstructive disease. 

rehab fig 24.6 

Figure 6

1) at rest, ventilation rate in patients is higher than in healthy people. Considering that VO2 and VCO2 values at rest are equal in both groups (about 300 mL/min), patients will have higher ventilatory equivalents numbers.

2) during exercise, the behavior of this parameter is similar in patients and healthy subjects, but patients show higher values.

3) when reaching maximum exercise intensity, patients with the obstructive disease cannot hyperventilate, and since VO2 remains constant, ventilatory equivalents stay constant. Other parameters. Within this section, we have included many of the parameters that can help in determining the differential diagnosis. These parameters are tidal volume versus inspiratory capacity ratio (TV/IC), and breathing reserve (BR). Objectively, it is necessary to keep in mind that BR is one of the key variables analyzed included in the ergospirometry software. The first thing to keep in mind when evaluating these parameters is to relate them to parameters obtained in the spirometry test. As illustrated in Figure 6, the response of tidal volume to an incremental exercise is closely related to the maximum minute ventilation.

3. Procedure and Interpretation of Results

The procedure for evaluating the test is to follow the logical reasoning, from the general to the specific. Seeing as the VO2 max is an integrative parameter in many physiological functions, it seems consistent to start by evaluating this parameter and to continue with more specific ones, such as the anaerobic threshold (AT). However, although this system is simple, it is difficult for both parameters (VO2 max and AT) to be modified independently.

Figure 9 (shows a flow chart (a decision tree) proposed by Calderon for an ergospirometry test [21], which is a simplified version of the flow charts proposed by Wasserman et al [5]. The proposed diagram has the advantage of being very simple, as it consists of eliminating invasive tests results at the expense of losing diagnostic rigor, in order to make these tests more accessible. However, it has the disadvantage of being too simple when there are associated pathologies, something that happens quite often.

Figure 9. Flow chart proposed by Calderon for an ergospirometry test [21], a simplified version of the flow charts proposed
by Wasserman et al [5].

Next, a brief explanation of the flow chart procedure is shown, according to both major respiratory diseases, classified as obstructive and restrictive. When assessing both the VO2max and the AT, the first problem the ergospirometry expert faces is assessing the criteria of normality. To our judgment, the best way to establish the criteria of normality is to have an available database of healthy people, ranging different ages and different fitness levels. As additional information, tables 5 (5) and 6 (6) show the most relevant values from our laboratory, published in a Ph.D. thesis [22].

Pulmonary disease Peripheral vascular disease Pulmo-
-nary disease cardiovascular disease
Coronary disease Pulmonary vascular disease
Chronic metabolic acidosis Pulmonary disease
(obstructive, restrictive)
Poor physical condition

It is widely known that VO2 max evolves with age [23-28] and training[24,25,29-31] and that there are gender-related differences [32]. Paradoxically, there are few studies where values for ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) in large populations of different age, gender, and physical condition are shown. The lack of data may be due to the complexity of the processes used to determine aerobic-anaerobic transition [10,18,33].

(10VO2max assessment.It seems logical to think that any patient suffering from either obstructive or restrictive type diseases will have a reduced VO2max compared to a healthy sedentary individual of the same age range and gender population. Considering Equation 2, any reduction in ventilation values will determine a decrease in VO2max, even while the oxygen difference is maintained between inhaled and exhaled air.

The maximum ventilation during exercise happens to be reduced in patients with various respiratory diseases regardless of the disease type (obstructive versus restrictive) [34-41].

Both P(A-a)O2 and P(a-et)CO2 are indirect parameters for ventilation/ perfusion ratio and/or increased alveolar dead space.Differential diagnosis can intuitively be made by observing the VE peak value and comparing it with the same subject´s reference values at rest, i.e, maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). Only respiratory patients have a low value of the difference between MVV and the maximum VE. These respiratory problems could be inferred by noting the changes in all parameters affecting the first member of the equation VEx (FIO2 - FEO2). The relationship between static spirometry values (maximum voluntary ventilation, breathing reserve) and maximum VE value will be altered, and so will estimative ergospirometry parameters related to ventilation/perfusion rate be.

2) Anaerobic threshold Assessment.The difficulty here is precisely based on which one of both ventilatory thresholds (VT1 or VT2) should be used. Initially, from a common sense point of view, it seems coherent to use VT1, for it is the parameter that denotes the aerobic-anaerobic transition, and is commonly used in untrained people.

However, as noted by Wasserman et al [5] an isolated decrease of AT does not occur, but rather, if the VO2 is low, then the AT will also be low. Therefore, respiratory patients will have low AT values. The analysis of a respiratory patient with low VO- 2max and AT levels is difficult to analyze, since, first, there are multiple causes that can that can lead to these alterations in ergospirometry (heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, anaemia, chronic metabolic acidosis, etc.), and, second, in these circumstances, there are often many related diseases that make it hard to discern what is the most significant illness that explains the symptoms. Due to this complexity, this is probably the least applicable case for ergospirometry as a diagnostic tool. Either way, it is essential to analyze every parameter previously pointed out in Section 2.



1.Macfarlane DJ. Automated metabolic gas analysis systems. Sports Medicine. 2001, 31(12): 841-861.

2.Duncan MacDougall, Howard A. Wenger. Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Hamilton, Ontario, Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, 1982.

3.Espinosa JS, Sanchéz Lafuente Gemar C. Prueba de Esfuerzo Cardíaca Respiratoria y deportiva. Barcelona, Edika Med. 2001.

4.Eston R, Reilly T. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual. London E and FN Spon. 2001.

5.Wasserman K, Hansen JE. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation: including pathophysiology and clinical applications, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia. 2005.

6.Horsfield K. Morphometry of airways. ComprehensivePhysiology.1986..

7.Singhal S, Henderson R. Morphometry of the human pulmonary arterial tree. Circulation Research. 1973, 33(2): 190-197.

8.Huang W, Yen RT, McLaurine M, Bledsoe G. Morphometry of the human pulmonary vasculature. J Appl Physiol. 81(5): 2123-2133

9.Grant BJ. Effect of local pulmonary blood flow control on the gas exchange: theory. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982, 53(5): 1100-1109

10.Brooks GA. Anaerobic threshold: a review of the concept and directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985, 17(1): 22-34..

11.Wasserman K, Beaver WL, Whipp BJ. Gas exchange theory and the lactic acidosis (anaerobic) threshold. Circulation. 1990, 81(1 Suppl): II14-30.

12.Schubert E. The theory of and experimentation into respiratory gas exchange-Carl Ludwig and his school. Pflugers Archiv: Pflugers Arch. 1995, 432(3 Suppl): R111-119.

13.Calderón F. Fisiología Humana. Aplicación a la actividad física. Madrid: Médica Panamericana. 2012.

14.Haldane, Graham & JS, JI. Methods of air analysis.1935.

15.Geppert J, Zuntz N. Ueber die regulation der athmung. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology. 1970, 42(1): 189-245.

16.WASSERMAN K, MCILROY MB. Detecting the Threshold of Anaerobic Metabolism in Cardiac Patients during Exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1964, 14: 844-852.

17.Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyl SN, Beaver WL. Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1973, 35(2): 236-243.

18.Beard DA, Lindinger MI, Boning D, Sahlin K, Bishop DJ et al. Comments on Point: Counterpoint: Muscle lactate and H(+) production do/do not have a 1:1 association in skeletal muscle. Confusion concerning the lactate proton ratio: a problem of definition?. J Appl Physiol. 2011, 110(5): 1493-1496.

19.López J, Legido J. Umbral anaeróbico, bases fisiológicas y aplicación, McGraw-Hill-Interamericana de España, Madrid, 1991.

20.Escourrou PJ, Delaperche MF, Visseaux A. Reliability of pulse oximetry during exercise in pulmonary patients.Chest. 1990, 97(3): 635-638.

21.Calderon FJ, Benito PJ. Aplicación práctica de las pruebas de esfuerzo. Selección. 2002, 11(4): 202-209.

22.Lorenzo Capellá I. Análisis descriptivo y correlacional de las pruebas de ergoespirometría realizadas en el laboratorio de fisiología del INEF de Madrid. DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA E INSTALACIONES APLICADAS A LA EDIFICACIÓN, AL MEDIO AMBIENTE Y AL URBANISMO. Madrid, Politécnica de madrid, 2009.

23.Astrand PO. Quantification of exercise capability and evaluation of physical capacity in man. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1976, 19(1): 51-67.

24.Astrand PO, Bergh U, Kilbom A. A 33-yr follow-up of peak oxygen uptake and related variables of former physical education students. J Appl Physiol. 1997, 82(6): 1844- 1852.

25.Paterson DH, Cunningham DA. The gas transporting systems: limits and modifications with age and training. Can J Appl Physiol. 1999, 24(1): 28-40.

26.Vandewalle H. [Oxygen uptake and maximal oxygen uptake: interests and limits of their measurements]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004, 47(6): 243-257.

27.Huggett DL, Connelly DM, Overend TJ. Maximal aerobic capacity testing of older adults: a critical review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 60(1): 57-66.

28.Schneider J. Age Dependency of Oxygen Uptake and Related Parameters in Exercise Testing: An Expert Opinion on Reference Values Suitable for Adults. Lung. 2013, 191(5): 449-458.

29.Neufer PD. The effect of detraining and reduced training on the physiological adaptations to aerobic exercise training. Sports Med. 1989, 8(5): 302-320.

30. Saltin B, Strange S. Maximal oxygen uptake: old and new arguments for a cardiovascular limitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992, 24(1): 30-37.

31.Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32(1): 70-84.

32.O’Toole ML. Gender differences in the cardiovascular response to exercise. Cardiovasc Clin. 1988, 19(3): 17-33.

33.Neary PJ, MacDougall JD, Bachus R, Wenger HA. The relationship between lactate and ventilatory thresholds: coincidental or cause and effect?. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985, 54(1): 104-108..

34.Wehr KL, Johnson RL Jr. Maximal oxygen consumption in patients with lung disease. J Clin Invest. 1976, 58(4): 880- 890.

35.Mohan Kumar T, Gimenez M. Maximal ventilation at rest and exercise in patients with the chronic pulmonary disease. Respiration. 1984, 46(3): 291-302.

36.Carter R, Peavler M. Predicting maximal exercise ventilation in patients with the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1987, 92(2): 253-259.

37.LoRusso TJ, Belman MJ, Elashoff JD, Koerner SK. Prediction of maximal exercise capacity in obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disease. CHEST Journal. 1993, 104(6): 1748- 1754.

38.Rochester DF, Esau SA. Assessment of ventilatory function in patients with neuromuscular disease. Clin Chest Med. 1994, 15(4): 751-763.

39.Dugan D. Walker R. The effects of a 9-week program of aerobic and upper body exercise on the maximal voluntary ventilation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1995, 15(2): 130-133.

40.Soto Campos JG, Ortega Ruiz F, Rodríguez Portal JA, Valenzuela Mateo F, Montemayor T, Sánchez Riera H et al. [Prediction of maximal ventilation during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Arch Bronconeumol. 1995, 31(9): 448-454.

41.Coast JR. Cline CC. The effect of chest wall restriction on exercise capacity. Respirology. 2004, 9(2): 197-203.

Cite this article: Montero F J C. Ergospirometry and Respiratory Pathology. J J Physical Rehab Med. 2016, 2(2): 024.

Contact Us:
TRAIL # 150 W
E-mail : info@jacobspublishers.com
Phone : 512-400-0398